Copy
No.12 (20/J/1938) Copy to:-
Shanghai C.G.
H.M. SUPREME COURT
SHANGHAI.
4th August, 1938.
Sir,
With reference to despatch No.14 of the 28th
May last addressed to Your Excellency by His Excellency
the Governor of Hong Kong, I have the honour to submit
the following observations in regard to the practical
application by His Britannic Majesty's Supreme Court for
China of the provisions of Article 70 of the China Order
in Council, 1925.
2.
Offenders sentenced to imprisonment by this
Court, of whom the large majority are Indians, may be
taken for present purposes as falling within one of the
following three classes, viz:-
Class A:
Class B:
Class C:
Offenders with long-term sentences (regardless
of whether deportation as part of the sentence
has been ordered under Article 89 (4) of the
Order in Council).
Offenders with short-term sentences when
deportation as part of the sentence has been
ordered.
Offenders with short-term sentences when
deportation as part of the sentence has not
been ordered.
Whilst no definite ruling has been laid down as to what
constitutes a short-term sentence, the latter in practice
is regarded as comprising any sentence of imprisonment up
to a term of five years. With the usual remission for
His Excellency
Sir Archibald Clerk Kerr, K.C.M.G.,
British Embassy,
Shanghai.
6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.